Virtacoinplus was a cryptocurrency spawned as an upgrade of the original Virtacoin effort. The goal was to provide a stronger, more secure, and community-oriented alternative to the original coin, whose lack of activity had been coupled with anemic development support. Virtacoinplus, under its ticker symbol XVP, was released with functionality meant to appeal to users with an interest in low-energy Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mining, quick transaction times, and long-term coin holdings. The project, while once popular, is no longer active but remains part of cryptocurrency history as one of numerous community forks attempting improvement over earlier designs.
The Origin of Virtacoinplus
Virtacoinplus was born in 2015 as a reimagined and better iteration of Virtacoin (VTA), this in turn having been a relaunch of the embattled Pennycoin. XVP was conceived as an effort to learn from the mistakes of the past and provide for a clearer and more decentralized future of the coin.
Its creators, in turn, wanted to make it an energy-efficient cryptocurrency run on the basis of user communities instead of centralized developers or individual investors. They also made the supply model straightforward with an emphasis on long-term coin holders by implementing a steady reward format with Proof-of-Stake, instead of utilizing Proof-of-Work mining.
Virtacoinplus was marketed as an inclusive, open-source option in an emerging market that was fast getting filled with increasingly sophisticated and resource-intensive projects.
Technology and Consensus Model
One of the key features of Virtacoinplus was its use of Proof-of-Stake (PoS) as the core consensus algorithm. Unlike Proof-of-Work (PoW) systems like Bitcoin, which require large amounts of computing power and electricity, PoS allows users to validate transactions and secure the network by simply holding coins in a wallet and staking them.
In XVP’s scenario, the staking rewards were meant to promote longer-term engagement. The block rewards were given proportionally to coin holders who had their wallets active online and staked their balances. This setup provided an incentive to hold, not trade, coins, ideally supporting network stability.
Its block time was quite small, while its transaction fees were low. This made the coin practical for fast daily payments, but its adoption never hit mass levels.
Supply and Inflation Model
Virtacoinplus had a predetermined maximum supply of around 10.3 billion coins. These coins comprised both the original pre-mined supply as well as new coins minted with the help of staking rewards.
The reward system followed a predictable model. Holders who staked their coins were rewarded with a fixed annual interest rate, which made returns easy to calculate. This was in contrast to coins that had variable reward structures or deflationary mechanics that were harder for average users to understand.
Because there was no mining difficulty involved and no need to buy specialized hardware, virtually anyone with a computer and an internet connection could participate in maintaining the network.
However, its large total supply made it difficult in making the coin gain value per coin over the long run. It also experienced difficulties with trading liquidity, limiting its presence on big exchanges.
Wallets and Usability
You could access Virtacoinplus with its dedicated desktop wallet, supporting both Windows and Linux operating systems. The wallet had fundamental capabilities like sending coins, receiving coins, staking, along with viewing history of performed operations.
It was also easy to initiate staking. The users only needed to keep the wallet open and online with coins held at a minimum staking age. That simplified method assisted in making it less inhibitive for those who wanted passive earning via staking.
However, the wallet had missed some of the newer, higher-level functionality like mobile support or multi-asset support. As time passed, the lack of significant development activity in the wallet made it increasingly difficult to keep current with changing operating system releases.
There were also some third-party wallets and forks of the original codebase, but these were rarely maintained by the broader community.
Societal Aspects and Community Involvement
Virtacoinplus was primarily spurred by a small but dedicated community. As it had no official foundation or central body, decisions regarding development as well as promotion were arrived at via unofficial discussions on online forums such as Bitcointalk.
It advocated philosophies of fairness, transparency, and decentralization but had neither funds nor an organizational framework with which to compete with better-resourced coins. Nonetheless, the community continued to uphold the blockchain several years after its release. There were efforts to create partnerships and raise awareness with social media and volunteer campaigns. Some merchants were urged to transact with XVP, while users were called upon to help beta test new functionality or promote staking guides.
As interest in staking grew in the broader crypto world, Virtacoinplus served as an example of an early, low-barrier PoS system. However, it failed to build the critical mass needed to sustain long-term growth and innovation.
Exchange Listings and Liquidity
Virtacoinplus could be found trading on several small crypto exchanges in its active years. Exchanges offered minimal trading pairs, typically with Bitcoin or occasionally Litecoin. Since the volume was low and interest among users scarce, liquidity continued to be an issue.
Volatility in prices was also high, and inter-order spreads could be large. This once again made it hard for users to purchase/sell large quantities without moving the market price. A large number of users merely staked the coin and waited, instead of trading it continuously.
Over time, when exchanges closed or delisted inactive projects, XVP became harder and harder to find. Nowadays, it’s not even traded on significant exchanges anymore and has become virtually invisible to mainstream crypto users.
Security and Network Status
Virtacoinplus had no major reported security breaches, but its low network activity made it vulnerable to potential threats such as 51% attacks or double spending. As the number of active nodes dropped and fewer users kept wallets online, the network’s resilience declined.
The blockchain technically continued to operate for some time, but since it wasn’t receiving new contributions or inputs, it wasn’t difficult anymore to consider it a secure or dependable network according to current-day standards.
This fate was not unusual for many smaller cryptocurrencies from the early and mid-2010s that didn’t manage to evolve with the fast-moving crypto space.
Legacy and Lessons
Virtacoinplus serves as an exemplary example of what goes wrong when an altruistic venture deploys without sustained funds, definitive development objectives, or effective community building. It offered an educational platform about PoS mechanics and staking and helped early users grasp how decentralized networks operate.
Although the project is largely inactive today, it remains a part of blockchain history. Coins like XVP highlight the importance of ongoing development, governance, and clear use cases in sustaining a cryptocurrency’s life cycle.
It also demonstrates that with easy-to-use and straightforward technology, survival in the crypto competitive market still requires more than goodwill.
Conclusion
Virtacoinplus was an energy-efficient, community-oriented cryptocurrency with an emphasis on simplicity and accessible staking. Using Proof-of-Stake, it presented a passive income framework and tried making progress over its predecessor, Virtacoin’s, checkered past.Despite its potential, the project struggled with low adoption, limited development, and exchange access. Over time, it became inactive, but its existence still holds lessons for developers and users interested in the challenges of sustaining a decentralized coin. While Virtacoinplus isn’t as widely used anymore, it’s still under the umbrella of experiment and ambition in the early days of cryptocurrency.